Town Hall @ Furman University: Anti-CRT/Truth Bills in SC
Recommended: Teachers Make a Difference
Paul Thomas Teachers Make a Difference – Lynn Harrill
Paul Thomas Teachers Make a Difference – George Carlin & Richard Pryor
National Poetry Month 2022
Wonder Woman Historia: The Amazons (Book Two): Women and Children, Goddesses/Gods and Mortals
Stories matter.
Throughout my childhood, my father told the stories of him growing up, and life before my sister and me, so many times, with so much detail, I can retell them myself today—several years past his death, many decades since I was a child.
Not a literary person, my father returned again and again to telling us about his courtship with my mother. They married in secret during her lunch break from her job working at a Winn-Dixie checkout counter.
We tell stories, often over and over, in an effort to understand better our lives, understand better what it means to be human. But I think, especially for my father, we tell stories of our lives to hold onto those moments and years that slip farther and farther into our past, fading.
As I read Wonder Woman Historia: The Amazons (Book Two), Kelly Sue DeConnick’s telling and retelling of mythology grounded in the Wonder Woman universe, I thought about my father’s storytelling as well as why we have myths. I explained that Book One, with artist Phil Jimenez, offers not just a beautiful and compelling superhero narrative, but also vivid and urgent messages for our lives today.
DeConnick joins artist Gene Ha in Book Two. Ha’s “Behind the Panels” shares DeConnick’s charge for Ha and her as co-creators of Book Two: “The scripts that follow should be considered more of a roadmap than a set of blueprints.”
DeConnick continues: “I’ve beaten this metaphor into the ground but my point is this: this is a collaborative process.”
This continuing story of Hippolyta and the Amazons, then, begins with the tensions of stories told (lies) and stories not told (truths).
Amazons demonized as monsters overshadows Amazons as savior-warriors: “No one speaks of the dead girls we avenged. Nor are there portraits of the ones we saved.”
Representation matters also.
This narrative tension speaks, of course, to the cultural tensions in the U.S. in 2022—an aggressive political Right running roughshod across the country decrying manufactured threats (Critical Race Theory) and demonizing educators as “groomers” in their Holy War against LGBTQ+ humanity.
Stories matter. But power matters more.
Hippolyta’s story is a story about stories, but it also is a story about another tension between Goddesses/Gods and mortals. When she comes upon Artemis, Hippolyta confesses her ultimate goal: “I need to be an Amazon.”
Marked by Artemis, Hippolyta is left to confront enslavers, introducing central themes of Book Two—the conditions of being women and children. Saved by Amazons, the enslaved children and Hippolyta are set free. However, Hippolyta challenges that freedom—not just for this moment, but “There is nowhere in this world of men for a woman to be free.”
Hippolyta’s outburst echoes Queen Hera’s anger earlier in Book Two: “There will be no justice for women. Not now. Not a hundred years from now. Not a thousand!”
Goddesses and mortal women, women and children—for them, Book Two establishes elements of shared existential realities around justice and freedom.
The plot of Book Two builds to a new Seventh Tribe of Amazons with Hippolyta as the leader, chosen by “consensus,” fitting seamlessly into the “collaboration” commitment from DeConnick in Ha’s “Behind the Panels.”
The new tribe, mortals, train and then experience their own mission against enslavers. Those who were freed now free others, but also confront the weight of “great power,” the ability to take life. Tarpeia, however, is restrained from killing a boy. “But he is one of them. He would have killed me!” she argues.
The Amazonian response is powerful and haunting: “He’s just a boy. He shouldn’t die for the sins of his father.”
In terms of contemporary relevance, I find this focus one of the key moments of Book Two.
A cultural and political narrative in the U.S. in 2022 involves centering parental rights over their children, an idealized view of parenting paired with denying the autonomy and humanity of children. States are passing legislation directly pronouncing that parents have primary authority over their children’s education.
However, as Book Two dramatizes, “Children only know the world they’ve seen, the world their parents have shown them. To be an adult, they think, is to do as they’ve seen done. It feels like a choice to them, but it isn’t.”
The fate of the boy becomes the ominous final conflict of Book Two, harkening Book Three with “Unleash hell upon them.”
Here, I come back to my father, and mother, and the “world” they showed me. As I have written about often, I was told many wrong stories, corrupting stories, and I could have been trapped in those narratives of racism and ignorance.
Until I learned otherwise—in science fiction and comic books, in comedy albums, and in classrooms where teachers were free to teach.
Again, stories matter.
But who controls them often matters more.
Academic Freedom Isn’t Free
My poem The 451 App (22 August 2022) is a science fiction/dystopian musing about the possibility of technology providing a comforting veneer to the creeping rise of totalitarianism—a simple App appearing on everyone’s smartphone before erasing all our books.
The point of the poem is less about technology and a dystopian future (alluding of course to Fahrenheit 451) and more about another work of literature: “The best lack all conviction, while the worst/Are full of passionate intensity” (“The Second Coming,” William Butler Yeats).
For me, this unmasking of the human condition has always been haunting; it also has become disturbingly relevant in the Trump/post-Trump present in which we live.
Real life is always far more mundane than speculative fiction—and far more shocking.
The “worst,” “full of passionate intensity,” launched an assault on academic freedom in the final months of the Trump administration. The initial wave seemed poised at The 1619 Project and a manufactured Critical Race Theory scare.
By January of 2022, a report found that educational gag orders passed in states across the U.S. were having a significant and chilling effect:
We found that at least 894 school districts, enrolling 17,743,850 students, or 35% of all K–12 students in the United States, have been impacted by local anti “CRT” efforts. Our survey and interviews demonstrate how such restriction efforts have been experienced inside schools as well as districts. We found that both state action and local activity have left many educators afraid to do their work.
The Conflict Campaign (January 2022)
As bills have increased since this report, the number of teachers and students impacted are certainly higher.
Concurrent with educational gag order legislation, book banning has increased dramatically, as reported by PEN America:
• In total, for the nine-month period represented, the Index lists 1,586 instances of individual books being banned, affecting 1,145 unique book titles. This encompasses different types of bans, including removals of books from school libraries, prohibitions in classrooms, or both, as well as books banned from circulation during investigations resulting from challenges from parents, educators, administrators, board members, or responses to laws passed by legislatures. These numbers represent a count of cases either reported directly to PEN America and/or covered in the media; there may be other cases of bans that have not been reported and are thus not included in this count.
• The Index lists bans on 1,145 titles by 874 different authors, 198 illustrators, and 9 translators, impacting the literary, scholarly, and creative work of 1,081 people altogether.
• The Index lists book bans that have occurred in 86 school districts in 26 states. These districts represent 2,899 schools with a combined enrollment of over 2 million students.
Banned in the USA: Rising School Book Bans Threaten Free Expression and Students’ First Amendment Rights
Republicans and conservatives have steadily created an environment of fear around teaching and learning, which is being detailed now by teachers experiencing that fear (with many leaving the field):
Last year, I was quoted in an article in the School Library Journal about how I discussed toxic masculinity with my high school students when we read Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet”together. Within days, far-right publications twisted my words to denounce “woke liberal indoctrination in schools.”
Strangers sent me messages on social media accusing me of indoctrinating students, of being unprofessional and unintelligent. I received a handwritten letter addressed to me at school. The letter accused me of being a “low-life, pseudo-intellectual, swallow-the-lib/woke/b—s— koolaid a — h—-.” [The hyphens were added to replace letters because of Washington Post style and not in the original].
‘Educators are afraid,’ says teacher attacked for ‘Romeo and Juliet’ unit, Sarah Mulhern Gross
This movement is driven by lies and fear mongering, but it depends on the missionary zeal of the liars and fear mongers as well as the passivity of “the best” among us.
My childhood and adolescence were profoundly shaped by books and movies—often the science fiction loved by my mother.
Along with The Andromeda Strain (film adapted from Michael Crichton’s novel), two films based on Ray Bradbury’s work remain with me today—The Illustrated Man and Fahrenheit 451.
There is a profound darkness and fatalism in these works, but in Fahrenheit 451, I was struck by the optimism and power of the individuals who walked around repeating the books they had become.
These people, the best among us, seem to suggest Bradbury held on to some sliver of hope.
It seems overwhelming to consider that as sentient creatures we are doomed to not recognize that things matter until they have been taken from us—taken from us with almost no resistance, with almost no recognition of the book being gently slipped from our hands and then our minds.
Academic freedom isn’t free, but without free minds—freedom to teach, freedom to learn, freedom to read and consider—we are no longer fully human.
Recommended
National Days of Teaching Truth
My 31 texts for 31 days in May
Freedom to Teach: Statement against Banning Books (NCTE)
Banned in the U.S.A. Redux 2021: “[T]o behave as educated persons would”
Censorship and Book Burning: A Reader [Updated]
Furman faculty pass resolution rejecting pending state legislation aimed at academic freedom
Educators’ Right and Responsibilities to Engage in Antiracist Teaching (NCTE)
Lehre Ist Tot
This past week an early career teacher, highly regarded in the classroom and very accomplished in the field of education, received a parental request that a student not be required to read The Great Gatsby. That parent, however, had signed a consent agreement with all texts, including that novel, identified as required reading at the beginning of the course.
The parent then reached out to the administration, who confirmed that the teacher had to assign a different work. This, of course, undermines the teacher and the process established, but it also creates more work for teachers already under incredible strain.
While parental oversight of assigned reading has been common in education for decades, this situation comes as states are increasingly passing parental trigger legislation, which moves the parental power from each parent’s own children to parents being able to ban works for all teachers or students to explore in classes.
That same teacher, frustrated and disillusioned, later that day read aloud their resignation letter to me in the context of telling me that much that they had taught in the first three years of teaching could no longer be taught in the last couple years—and increasingly will be directly banned in the coming year (as my home state is poised to pass its own educational gag order this spring).
The teacher cried while reading the letter aloud, and added that the resignation was depressing; this, you see, was a career they had been working toward since high school—and within 6 years, teaching is dead.
The current anti-teacher climate in the U.S. is incredibly harsh and driven by orchestrated false narratives:
Right-wing media are creating parental trigger structures even without the concurrent legislation:
While teacher and school bashing (notably as “liberal indoctrination”) has a long history in the U.S., reaching back to Catholic schools fighting for market space as public schooling increased in the 19th century, the current anti-teacher climate has its roots not in Republican politics but in the Obama administration’s education agenda.
Obama’s appointment of Arne Duncan as Secretary of Education heralded an era of education reform that actually doubled-down on the worst aspects under George W. Bush, and that doubling down feed into a growing media attack on “bad teachers.”
Instead of rejecting the standard approaches to education reform begun under Reagan and federalized under W. Bush, the Obama administration turned their blame to teachers and teacher quality. During the Obama years, the great experiment in value-added methods (VAM) devastated the teaching profession.
The perennial paradox of education has always been that teacher quality matters but it remains a very small part of measurable student achievement (only about 10-15%). Therefore, the Holy Grail of the VAM experiment—identifying “good” and “bad” teachers through standardized test scores of students—was always doomed to fail.
But it did accomplish planting the seeds of today’s multi-pronged attack on teachers—the “science of reading” movement blaming teachers and teacher educators for student reading achievement and the anti-CRT/educational gag order movements being linked to parent trigger laws.
Throughout the education reform era over the past 40 years, many of us in education have argued that education reform initiatives are less about improving education and more about killing public education and the teaching profession—charter schools and voucher schemes, Teach For America, VAM and merit pay, demonizing and dismantling unions and tenure, etc., to name a few.
From Fox News lies to parental trigger laws and education gag orders, the evidence is very clear now that this current wave of teacher bashing is definitely about killing the profession, and not about student discomfort.
Let me return to the opening teacher story.
When the parent was asked for reasons why they wanted their child not to read The Great Gatsby—so the teacher had context for choosing an alternate text—the parent responded that they did not want the child (a high school student) to read about inappropriate relationships and sexual content. So here is a point of fact about the insincerity of these challenges; that student had already read and studied The Crucible, without any complaint, a play grounded in adultery.
I am certain some parents challenging what their children are being taught are sincere, but I am also certain the larger political motivation among conservatives is to completely dismantle public education.
Just as I have explained that there simply is no CRT propaganda agenda in K-12 schools, there is no liberal indoctrination/grooming occurring in K-12 (or K-16) education either.
The Ingraham rants are simply political lies.
And these lies are not improving education.
They have one goal and it seems to have been effective: Teaching is dead.
WandaVision: Pastiche, Past, and Present (A Course)
Below I am sharing my MayX (2 credit undergraduate) course I will be offering in about a month.
The course grew out of the following post based on the series WandaVision: Teaching WandaVision: A Textset on Pastiche.
See Also
A Vision of Being Human: “Am I normal?”
EDU 116 – WandaVision: Pastiche, Past, and Present
“The law is meant to be my servant and not my master, still less my torturer and my murderer.” — James Baldwin. The Nation. July 11, 1966.
Equity, Anti-Racism, and Anti-Bias Statement
#BlackLivesMatter
In my teaching, scholarship, public writing, and life, I am fully committed to racial, gender, and all forms of equity not yet realized throughout the U.S. and world. While academic spaces are often intellectually challenging and even uncomfortable, I will not tolerate in any aspect of this course language, ideas, or behavior/symbolism that are hostile to marginalized/oppressed groups (racism, sexism/misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, etc.).
Academic freedom for students and professors is tethered to consequences, and is not license. (See Free Speech and Diversity of Thought?)
Students uncertain about what language and ideas are not acceptable because they are hostile or offensive are invited to discuss those questions with me privately and are guaranteed those exchanges will be treated confidentially and respectfully. I am eager to share evidence, research, and reading to help anyone better understand goals of equity, anti-racism, and anti-bias (see materials in Box, Race and Racism).
If you witness or experience any form of bias, please report here:
Course Overview
Catalogue Description
This MayX will explore reconsidering the past through the present by viewing the 9-episode series WandaVision (and other texts), which incorporates pastiche as a technique to reflect and challenge the sit-com genre. Students will apply critical media literacy strategies to explore pop culture and apply those strategies to understanding public and popular controversies in K-12 education. An active subscription to Disney+ during MayX is required.
Course Topics
Critical media literacy/ K-12 educational controversies
Pastiche
History/teaching history
Pop culture/Marvel Cinematic Universe/sitcoms
Race/gender
Course Texts
Vision: The Complete Collection (graphic novel)
WandaVision (series)
Pleasantville (film)
Sitcom episodes (TBD)
Brief readings (TBD; see schedule)
Course Objectives
- Understanding and application of the concept of “pastiche” in media and pop culture
- Understanding and application critical media literacy strategies
- Awareness of educational controversies (for example, Critical Race Theory, the 1619 Project)
- Understanding of the field of history (relationship of past and present) and the teaching of history
- Understanding of the essential aspects of liberal arts education
- Reconsideration of race and gender in history and pop culture
Assignments
- Read Vision (before class sessions) and submit reflections* per schedule below
- View WandaVision episodes (before class sessions) and submit reflections* focusing on pastiche technique in each episode
- Independent Project – critical analysis of one episode of a classic sit-com referenced in WandaVision after series viewing (PP and class presentation)
- Group Activity – viewing Pleasantville (film) for in-class critical analysis in groups
- Final Portfolio Submission (all assignments resubmitted in Box folder)
* Written reflections should be submitted per the daily schedule below. Submit each reflection pasted into email (not attached) and include the reflection number (see schedule) in the “subject” line of the email. Due before each class session by schedule.
Schedule (Meeting 9 am -12 pm)
Week 1
May 11
Course Overview and Assignments
Read Vision (before class sessions) and submit reflections per schedule below
View WandaVision episodes (before class sessions) and submit reflections focusing on pastiche technique in each episode
Independent project – critical analysis of one episode of a classic sit-com referenced in WandaVision after series viewing (PP and class presentation)
Group activity – viewing Pleasantville (film) for in-class critical analysis in groups
May 12
Intro – Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU); Sitcoms; Pastiche (Postmodern Use of Parody and Pastiche, Nasrullah Mambrol)
Critical Media Literacy – Teachable Moment: Fake News and Critical Media Literacy
Rethinking the past through the present? – Dismantling Monuments: History as a Living Document
May 13
Intro – Wanda and Vision
Teaching WandaVision: A Textset on Pastiche
Week 2
May 16
Vision 1-3 (reading and reflection DUE before class) discussion
May 17
Vision 4-6 (reading and reflection DUE before class) discussion
May 18
Vision 7-9 (reading and reflection DUE before class) discussion
May 19
Vision 10-12 (reading and reflection DUE before class) discussion
May 20
NO CLASS SESSION
Week 3
May 23
WandaVision E1 – Filmed Before a Live Studio Audience
WandaVision E2 – Don’t Touch That Dial
(Viewing and reflection DUE before class)
May 24
WandaVision E3 – Now in Color
WandaVision E4 – We Interrupt This Program
WandaVision E5 – On a Very Special Episode…
(Viewing and reflection DUE before class)
May 25
WandaVision E6 – All-New Halloween Spooktacular!
WandaVision E7 – Breaking the Fourth Wall
WandaVision E8 – Previously On
(Viewing and reflection DUE before class)
May 26
WandaVision E9 – The Series Finale
(Viewing and reflection DUE before class)
May 27
NO CLASS SESSION
Week 4
May 30 Memorial Day Holiday
May 31
Pleasantville (DVD Collection PN1995.9.C55 P63 1999) in-class viewing/discussion
June 1
Last class – final portfolio/exam DUE (submit in Box)
Presentations shared in class
The Good Student Trap: Research Paper Edition
I teach good students.
I write that with no sarcasm, or cynicism.
For the past 20 years, I have been teaching at a selective liberal arts university, and the students are mostly high-achieving young adults who graduated high school as A or B students.
Like me, my students also have a tendency toward the often ignored consequences of being gifted or smart—anxiety, depression, imposter’s syndrome, perfectionism.
While “good student” is a compliment, I remain convinced that performing as a good student is also, as Adele Scheele argued, a trap. Scheele posed that students learn good student habits in high school that they then apply in college, but often find those behaviors no longer are successful—or even valued by professors:
We were learning the Formula.
• Find out what’s expected.
• Do it.
• Wait for a response.And it worked.
The Good Student Trap (excerpt), Adele Scheele
But more powerful that acknowledging that good student behavior doesn’t translate into college, Scheele also confronts how the good student trap creates irrational fear:
So what’s the problem? The problem is the danger. The danger lies in thinking about life as a test that we’ll pass or fail, one or the other, tested and branded by an Authority. So, we slide into feeling afraid we’ll fail even before we do—if we do. Mostly we don’t even fail; we’re just mortally afraid that we’re going to. We get used to labeling ourselves failures even when we’re not failing. If we don’t do as well as we wish, we don’t get a second chance to improve ourselves, or raise our grades. If we do perform well, we think that we got away with something this time. But wait until next time, we think; then they’ll find out what frauds we are. We let this fear ruin our lives. And it does.
The Good Student Trap (excerpt), Adele Scheele
I often watch these dynamics with my first-year students, which I anticipate. But the most dramatic example of this tension is in my upper-level writing/research course, notably when students submit this assignment:
Assignment
Students will conduct a research project in which they critically analyze how the above chosen issue is presented in the mainstream media, and write in a workshop format (multiple drafts, conferencing) an 8-10 page essay using APA format (see link above and student resources provided) detailing how well or not the media has presented the research. See Sample APA 7e with comments. NOTE: This cited essays is primarily a critical analysis of media coverage, and not simply an essay on your chosen education topic. The essay should include the following major sections: opening, literature review, media coverage, relationship between research and media, and closing/conclusion.
For 8-10 pages, a proposed structure:
Opening – about 1 page (2-4 paragraphs); be sure to include essay focus on media
literature review – 2 pages; focus on *patterns* in the sources (write about your topics, not the sources)
media coverage – 2 pages; focus on *patterns* in the media and include several examples
relationship between research and media – 2 pages; this is the most important goal of the essay so connect research and media examples
closing/conclusion – about 1 page (2-4 paragraphs); must emphasize essay focus, media analysis
Assignment for EDU 250, Paul Thomas, Furman University
Despite the highly structured details in the assignment, and despite students having several class sessions devoted to workshopping the assignment (and two scaffolded assignments—submitting a working references list and submitting annotated bibliographies for their sources), they struggle with completing the assignment as assigned, resulting in intense and negative responses to the feedback I provide on the first full submission.
The good student trap experienced by students here is that instead of conducting, writing, and submitting a media analysis project, students fall back to writing a high school research paper.
The reductive and inauthentic research paper students learn in high school is essentially behaving and writing like a student—collecting and writing an overview of “sources,” typically plowing through those sources one at a time and heavily quoting from each source.
The assignment I ask students to engage in requires that they move away from student behaviors and toward writing as scholars; that shift means that they gather and student scholarly sources in order to provide themselves a lens for writing an original essay (in this case, becoming expert on an educational topic in order to analyze the quality of media coverage of that topic).
For example, students tend to write “research papers” that explicitly state “my sources” and “my media articles” in order to detail “what I learned about X topic” instead of analyzing how media covers that topic.
My feedback includes nudging them (again) not to write like students, stressing that they are not doing the assignment (I refer them to the outline provided and the need to focus on “media analysis”), and warning them about citation concerns (including carelessness that rises to technical plagiarism).
With my feedback, the fear and negative response cycle kicks in. Students seem unable to trust a workshop environment in which draft submission, feedback, and revision are not only expected but required.
The good student trap has also trained students to see all feedback as evaluation, judgment, and to fear that not being immediately perfect is a signal that they have failed, or that they are going to fail.
Anticipating their fear and expecting they received my feedback negatively, I emailed them and assured them that revision was expected and that everyone was still capable of making an A in the course regardless of how well their initial submission had fulfilled the assignment.
In the first class after returning their essays with comments, however, they were mostly frantic; many of their comments were dramatic distortions of the feedback they received.
None the less, once they had their draft in front of them, they admitted seeing the gap between the assignment and what they submitted was much clearer to them.
So here is what my good students teach me over and over.
First, they confirm that prescriptions and templates are not nearly as effective as many people believe; I have always rejected prescriptions, templates, rubrics, and prompts for teaching writing—despite their all being common in traditional classrooms.
Students respond better to direct instruction once they have an artifact in front of them for context.
Next, they demonstrate for me the negative power of prior behavior that is successful, regardless of the credibility of that behavior. In this case, students struggle mightily to let go of the research paper.
And finally, they embody the paralysis of fear of not being good enough, not being perfect.
Unless traditional schooling changes—and I suspect it will not—I am faced with this reality continuing, and ultimately, I regret that the ones who suffer most in the good student trap are students themselves.
ANNOUNCING: National Days of Teaching Truth
REGISTER HERE for NDTT Webinar May 2 7:30 EST
Access information on National Days of Teaching Truth
See a listing of 31 texts for May HERE (add in comments any text you will be teaching and a date; I will add to the sheet)
Paul Thomas National Days of Teaching Truth
The Politics of Calling for No Politics: 2022 Edition (South Carolina)
My home state of South Carolina appears determined to join the misleading and misguided “anti-CRT” bandwagon that mandates curriculum gag orders, centers parental control over schooling, and legislates a simplistic and nonsensical characterization of “ideology.”
After weeks of deliberation and public testimony opposing a flurry of five bills (H.4325, H.4343, H.4392, H.4605, and H.4799), the SC House Education and Public Works Committee passed a unified bill (H. 5183) that wasn’t made public until after the vote.
While maintaining much of the copy-cat language from similar bills being proposed and passed across the U.S., the bill appears to compile many of the worst features of these attacks on academic freedom—curriculum and instruction gag orders, parental trigger mechanisms, and vague as well as contradictory language.
The opening section on “intent” seeks to frame the bill in positive terms; however, the content of the rest of the bill directly and repeated contradicts those stated intentions, suggesting either they are insincere or that legislators, again, have no business prescribing and mandating curriculum and instruction.
By the third subsection of section 2, the crux of the problem with the bill is stated:
Section 59-29-620. (A) The following prohibited concepts may not be included or promoted in a course of instruction, curriculum, assignment, instructional program, instructional material, or professional educator development or training:
South Carolina Transparency and Integrity in Education Act
Regardless of what is listed next (and the listing is incredibly problematic, as I will examine), this is not an acceptable approach to legislating education in a free democratic nation. This is a disturbing example of people with political power trying to erase the politics of other people through that power—the politics of calling for no politics.
The damning irony of this bill is that it is an ideological treatise with real-world consequences that legislates the exact conditions the bill purports to be eradicating from public schools.
The only way to identify “prohibited concepts” is through an ideological lens. The only way to have a free and open educational environment is to protect academic freedom, the opposite of curriculum and instruction bans.
The ideology behind the prohibition of concepts is exposed in several of the list of gag orders:
- “an individual, by virtue of the race, sex, ethnicity, religion, color, or national origin of the individual, inherently is privileged, racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or subconsciously” — This banned concept includes factual content (privilege, conscious and unconscious bias) that is well supported by research in several academic fields, and by banning factual content, legislators are imposing their ideologies onto the classroom, which they claim is the condition they are trying to erase from the classroom.
- “meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic: (a) are racist or sexist; or (b) were created by members of a particular race or sex to oppress members of another race, sex, ethnicity, color, or national origin; and” — Here, legislators are imposing their ideology onto protected concepts (again, exposing an ideological bias) that are no longer open for critique or debate (a direct contradiction of an opening intent stated in the bill: “high school students graduate having learned critical thinking skills and being college ready and career ready”). No one can learn and practice critical thinking in an environment where some concepts are banned and other concepts are protected.
The list of prohibited concepts ends with a caveat of sorts, which proves to be equally problematic:
(D) Notwithstanding subsection (A), LEAs are not prohibited from including concepts as part of a course of instruction, in a curriculum or instructional program, or through the use of supplemental instructional materials if those concepts involve:…
(2) the impartial discussion of controversial aspects of history; or
(3) the impartial instruction on the historical oppression of a particular group of people based on race, ethnicity, class, nationality, religion, or geographic region.
South Carolina Transparency and Integrity in Education Act
The focus on “impartial” fits into the opening statements of intent, and “impartial” is a traditional expectation of teaching and scholarship; however, since this and other bills like this are often vague in the rhetoric, what exactly “impartial” means in different contexts should be a concern.
In other words, does this bill prohibit teachers and students declaring horrific events in history (such as the Holocaust and slavery in the U.S.) as morally wrong?
Impartiality can be as distorting as bias, in fact.
A final monumental ideological problem the bill is that it centers parents in the role of policing curriculum (content) and instruction (including lesson plans)—an ideological decision that ignores the autonomy and interests of children.
After providing guidelines for parents monitoring and complaining about curriculum and instruction, the bill would codify the role of parents in their children’s education:
SECTION 3. Section 59-28-180 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:
“Section 59-28-180. (A) Parent involvement influences student learning and academic performance; therefore, parents are expected to: …
(14) be the primary source of their student’s education in regard to learning morals, ethics, and civic responsibility.
South Carolina Transparency and Integrity in Education Act
Not only does this bill idealize parental ideology, but also it ignores that the purposes of universal public education are designed for individual liberty (students) and for democratic ideals (the community0; in other words, public schools are not designed to impose the unique ideology of each parent.
As I have detailed often in my writing, I was raised in a racist home and community; I was exposed to a better ideology through my formal schooling.
Ultimately, this bill is mandating parental indoctrination to the exclusion of students’ right and democracy.
Republicans are declaring themselves the party of their indoctrination is more important than anyone’s academic freedom. The party of the politics of calling for no politics.
dr. p.l. (paul) thomas 